FCC Raises Benchmark of High-Speed Broadband
- Written by Elijah Ugoh Cybersecurity & Tech Writer
- Fact-Checked by
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has officially changed its definition of broadband from 25Mbps/3Mbps to 100Mbps/20Mbps.
The March 14 decision comes 9 years after its last redefinition and concludes that “advanced telecommunications capability is not being deployed in a reasonable and timely fashion based on the total number of Americans, Americans in rural areas, and people living on Tribal lands.” This effectively raises the standard for decent internet speeds across the United States.
While the new standard seems like an audacious aim, increasing broadband speeds four-fold, it’s been a long time coming.
Even in 2015, there was criticism that the 25 Mbps standard was insufficient and put many Americans at a disadvantage. FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said at the time, “I think our new threshold, frankly, should be 100Mbps. I think anything short of that shortchanges our children, our future, and our new digital economy.”
The new standard was set based on what is “now used in multiple federal and state programs (such as NTIA’s BEAD Program and multiple USF programs), consumer usage patterns, and what is actually available from and marketed by internet service providers,” says the FCC’s press release.
But whether Americans can enjoy better internet service depends on where they live. For instance, the FCC report shows that “fixed terrestrial broadband service (excluding satellite) has not been physically deployed to approximately 24 million Americans, including almost 28% of Americans in rural areas, and more than 23% of people living on Tribal lands.”
“45 million Americans lack access to 100/20 Mbps fixed service and 35/3 Mbps mobile 5G-NR service,” the report adds.
Why is raising the speed metric important?
“This fix is overdue,” Rosenworcel said. “It also helps us better identify the extent to which low-income neighborhoods and rural communities are underserved.”
Raising the metric matters because it sets the standard for what Internet Service Providers (ISPs) need to provide American consumers, no matter where they live.
As part of its announcement on Thursday, the FCC also set a 1 Gbps/500 Mbps long-term goal for broadband speeds. Hopefully, this will prevent future stagnancy when it comes to outdated standards of digital access.
AI Under Attack: How Google’s Gemini Falls Prey to Security Breaches
- Written by Deep Shikha Content Writer
- Fact-Checked by
A recent report by cybersecurity researchers at HiddenLayer revealed significant security flaws in the advanced models of Google’s Gemini. These vulnerabilities could lead to various threats, from the potential spread of false information to unauthorized data access.
The first issue reported was the leakage of system prompts, where attackers could trick the AI into revealing system prompts. It’s dangerous because it could lead the LLM to reveal its specific instructions, including sensitive information like passwords. An attacker can use this information to reverse engineer these details for theft or to launch a stronger attack.
As per Google, it has made extra efforts with the Gemini models to prevent the creation of misinformation, especially concerning election-related topics . However, the researchers at HiddenLayer could easily prompt jailbreaks by asking the model to enter the fictional state. This jailbreak attack shows that Gemini can’t prevent all types of misinformation.
This poses a significant risk to users who might not be aware of AI’s limitations. It’s imperative that users exercise caution, verify AI-generated content’s accuracy, and secure input data against potential injections.
HiddenLayer found another anomaly where repeating rare tokens prompted the model to reveal its instructions, inadvertently mirroring a previously noted vulnerability. This method exploits the model’s training, which differentiates user input from system prompts, by tricking it with nonsensical tokens to disclose its instructions.
While the HiddenLayer investigation focused on Gemini, the research highlights broader challenges facing AI language models regarding security and privacy. These security flaws can easily be found in other LLMs as well. With AI tools becoming more and more accessible, this research has highlighted the continuous need to thoroughly test all LLM models for prompt attacks, training data extraction, model manipulation, data poisoning, and exfiltration.
Google’s role in addressing these challenges is paramount, which means continuously improving the Gemini models to reduce risks. This involves making the models better at resisting manipulation and adding stronger protections against known exploitation methods.
“To help protect our users from vulnerabilities, we consistently run red-teaming exercises and train our models to defend against adversarial behaviors like prompt injection, jailbreaking, and more complex attacks,” a Google representative told The Hacker News . “We’ve also built safeguards to prevent harmful or misleading responses, which we are continuously improving.”
The emergence of these security flaws within Gemini is a poignant reminder of the complexities inherent in AI development. It highlights the industry-wide need to fortify AI systems against manipulation and misuse, ensuring that they remain secure, reliable, and trustworthy for users worldwide as these technologies continue to advance.
